The Crown of the Outlands respects
the opinion of its peers and desires their complete and candid counsel.
However, it is understood that the Crown shall have the freedom to accept or to
decline the counsel of their peers without penalty, provided the below is
followed.
A. The following
is in addition to any requirements of Corpora.
B. For the below
purposes, the reign of monarchs includes their time as Crown Prince and
Princess as well as time as King and Queen.
C. The Candidate
shall be Discussed at least once in a meeting (‘Circle meeting’) of the order.
D. Discussion
shall specifically be of the proposition that the candidate shall receive
admission to the peerage order. A date certain need not be stated.
E. A Circle
Meeting is and only is one announced in writing (print or email) in advance of
the event with enough specificity that any peer of the order reasonably
desiring to attend may do so.
F. The Circle
meeting in which the candidate is discussed must be during the reign of the
monarchs who subsequently offer (although not necessarily those who perform)
the admission.
G. It is expressly
not required that the intent to admit be agreed to by vote, consensus or
affirmation by the order. It is required that at minimum the monarchs state
clearly and unambiguously to that meeting their intention to make such an offer
to the discussed candidate during the reign of the monarchs.
H. The peers shall
maintain the confidentiality of the monarch’s intent, unless specifically
charged to release that information.
I would note that this is a fairly good rendition of current
practice with one exception. It would preclude the sort of field knightings
where the order meeting is held impromptu at the event. I simply can see no way
of defining a circle meeting otherwise, without making the law so trivial that it
would effectively be no law at all. I submit that this is perhaps a loss, but a
small one. Perhaps if an exception is to be made for that sort of thing it
would be to define for an on-the-spot meeting, a non-trivial number of peers
must be present (for that case only).
No comments:
Post a Comment